IF THE INSTITUTIONS, CIVIL SOCIETY, LAWYER’S ORGANISATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATION ADOPT DUAL STANDARDS THEN THE SYSTEM OF JUSTICE CAN NOT BE ESTABLISHED IN THE COUNTRY – ALTAF HUSSAIN
 London 
– 18th January 2008
London 
– 18th January 2008
MQM Founder & Leader Mr Altaf Hussain has stated that if the concerned quarters, institutions, civil society, lawyer’s organisations and human rights organisation will adopt dual standards then the system of justice cannot be established in the country. He said that it does not suit those adopting dual standard of justice to raise slogan of independence of judiciary. He was addressing a session of MQM Coordination Committee at the International Secretariat in London attended by MQM Convenor Dr Imran Farooq, Senior Deputy Convenor Tariq Jawaid, Members of Coordination Committee Saleem Shahzad, Mohammad Anwar, Tariq Mir, Javed Kazmi, Mustafa Azizabadi, Incharge Coordination Committee Pakistan Anwar Alam, Waseem Aftab, Shakeel Umer and Naik Mohammad.
Mr Hussain said that
Pakistan is passing 
through the most critical phase of its history and in the geopolitical strategic situation of Central Asia and South Asia we don’t see a friendly 
neighbouring country. Certain analysts appearing on the media are quoting Sir 
Winston Churchill during the Second World War when the German Army was advancing 
and it was feared that they will occupy Britain. Then Prime Minister Churchill 
asked are the courts independent and providing justice? He was informed that the 
courts are independent and dispensing justice – to which he replied then until 
such time our courts remain independent and are dispensing justice no one can 
occupy our country. Addressing those who refer to Winston Churchill and raise 
the slogan of independence of judiciary he asked, where were the champions of 
judiciary when on 27th, 28th and 29th December 
2007 Sindh witnessed bloodshed, homes, shops, businesses and factories were set 
alight, and during this bloodshed several innocent citizens were burnt alive. 
Why these champions of independence of judiciary and human rights organisations 
did not come to their rescue? Why they did not even
 
strategic situation of Central Asia and South Asia we don’t see a friendly 
neighbouring country. Certain analysts appearing on the media are quoting Sir 
Winston Churchill during the Second World War when the German Army was advancing 
and it was feared that they will occupy Britain. Then Prime Minister Churchill 
asked are the courts independent and providing justice? He was informed that the 
courts are independent and dispensing justice – to which he replied then until 
such time our courts remain independent and are dispensing justice no one can 
occupy our country. Addressing those who refer to Winston Churchill and raise 
the slogan of independence of judiciary he asked, where were the champions of 
judiciary when on 27th, 28th and 29th December 
2007 Sindh witnessed bloodshed, homes, shops, businesses and factories were set 
alight, and during this bloodshed several innocent citizens were burnt alive. 
Why these champions of independence of judiciary and human rights organisations 
did not come to their rescue? Why they did not even
 come 
to issue a statement condemning this mayhem? Why the women’s organisations who 
raise their voice for women rights kept silent over the rape of innocent 
womenfolk in Sindh, particularly 
Karachi, 
during these days? The innocent men who were brutally burnt alive were also 
someone’s brothers, fathers, husbands, loved one or the breadwinners for their 
families – so why did the members of civil society, lawyer’s organisations and 
human rights organisations not even shed a tear? Do they not consider these 
innocent people as Pakistanis, Muslims and even human beings? Why the champions 
of justice have kept their silence on the open violence faced by the people of 
Sindh? – Till today no one from the civil society, lawyer’s organisations or the 
human rights organisations have raised their voice against the
come 
to issue a statement condemning this mayhem? Why the women’s organisations who 
raise their voice for women rights kept silent over the rape of innocent 
womenfolk in Sindh, particularly 
Karachi, 
during these days? The innocent men who were brutally burnt alive were also 
someone’s brothers, fathers, husbands, loved one or the breadwinners for their 
families – so why did the members of civil society, lawyer’s organisations and 
human rights organisations not even shed a tear? Do they not consider these 
innocent people as Pakistanis, Muslims and even human beings? Why the champions 
of justice have kept their silence on the open violence faced by the people of 
Sindh? – Till today no one from the civil society, lawyer’s organisations or the 
human rights organisations have raised their voice against the bloodshed, loot and plunder and expressed their sympathy and support for the 
victims. Do these elements deserve to raise their voice for the independence of 
judiciary? Can we establish a system of justice with such double standards? Why 
this double standard by those who talk of justice, such as the human rights 
organisations, civil society and the lawyer’s organisations, that they make a 
lot hue and cry on one issue but criminally keep silent over naked oppression, 
bloodshed, loot and plunder, and not even come to see the bodies of those who 
died?
 
bloodshed, loot and plunder and expressed their sympathy and support for the 
victims. Do these elements deserve to raise their voice for the independence of 
judiciary? Can we establish a system of justice with such double standards? Why 
this double standard by those who talk of justice, such as the human rights 
organisations, civil society and the lawyer’s organisations, that they make a 
lot hue and cry on one issue but criminally keep silent over naked oppression, 
bloodshed, loot and plunder, and not even come to see the bodies of those who 
died? 
Mr Hussain stated that this is not an act of justice. The concerned quarters, institutions, civil society, lawyer’s organisations and human rights organisations who raise the slogan of justice and fair play if they will adopt dual standards then how can a system of justice be established in the country. Those who talk of justice and fair play should cease to be hypocritical not only the country’s judiciary be free, fair and independent but also the civil society, lawyer’s organisations, human rights organisations, political and religious parties should also believe in justice and fairness and should remain impartial at all times. They must call a spade a spade, only then the country will become stronger, otherwise those with dual standards with failed and their slogans for the independence of judiciary will remain hollow.
